Sunday, March 13, 2011

Possibly True?

Black Dogs is a novel-in-stories by Jason Buhrmester. The story is told in the first person by a character named Patrick who's goal in life is to steal the cash Led Zeppelin is paid in advance. For Rock enthusiasts, this book is an ambitious recreation of true events surrounding the $203,000 mysteriously stolen from Led Zeppelin. Patrick's adventures include degenerate friends from his hometown of Baltimore who are in and out of jail as well as a gang of older, born again motorcyclists. The continued title of this book is The Possibly True Story of Classic Rock's Greatest Robbery, this idea of possibly true seems to be a continued thread used by Buhrmester in his telling.

The truest thing readers are left with is that Buhrmester struggles to develop realistic characters. For a novel that is told through a first person narrator, Patrick is hardly given any physical description until he is going to the court house at the end, readers barely know anything about him until he begins to explain his homelife and even that is plagued by clichés. What the author lacks in character development he supplements with cliches. All the "thug" characters such as Backwoods Billy, Danny, Boogie and Manicini are TV-show villains with only two things in mind, kicking ass and getting money. Farfetched incidences such as the D.A. asking him for percocet in the hospital only serve to make the characters inauthentic because through writing situations so unrealistic it's hard to give any credibility to characters. Buhrmester's tales seem impossible because they are relayed without any logistic detail. His characters are developed as stereotypes: one dimensional, dumb, robbers. Buhrmester's overall plot seems too sophisticated for them, rendering the book unbelievable. The overuse of cliches in this novel moves to the point of offensive when the author tries to develop female characters, showing how little he knows about women.

Several forms are being used in this book, some better than others. The use of the how-to form at the top of Electric Funeral is pleasing to readers and quite functional. Buhrmester's dialogue is the form that seems to trip him up, contributing to the overall demise of character development. The dialogue is particularly unpleasant in the character of Emily, there's a line near the beginning of the book where she says, "Which part? The part when you and Alex robbed my best friend's house or the part when you stood me up on New Year's Eve and left town without ever talking to me again?" which causes the reader to wonder what woman would actually say that? In less than five pages Patrick and Emily are making out. Are women really that easy? Again she is shown shouting, "Are you listening to me?" when Patrick is in the hospital. She is so undynamic and such a horrible stereotype of a nagging girlfriend that it borders on chauvinism. Another issue with the dialogue is that no character has any specific speech pattern or distinction of voice.

If you can't remember this book is set in the 70s, every page will remind you. Buhrmester clogs his prose with awkwardly placed pop culture references that distract rather than thicken. It comes off as forced, as if he has to remind himself what era it takes place in. He also keeps reminding you of his character's devotion to Black Sabbath in a nauseating line, "-worst of all he hated Black Sabbath." And again later on when Patrick is pontificating about The Doors, "I always liked The Doors- You either loved or hated The Doors. I loved them." No kidding. Another insultingly repititious line occurs when the goons eventually find the Led Zepp cash. They are shouting out inaccurate estimations of how much cash it is until they count it up to $203,000, "We were both wrong." Again, no kidding.

If you're the guy who thinks he knows everything about 70s rock music than this is the book for you. It's like listening to that popular burn-out in high school spin you an afternoon's worth of bullshit under the secondary title of Possibly True. Every chapter is too cleanly summed up like an after-school special leaving the reader thinking, no way. Buhrmester's prose reads as awkwardly as the teen years being described and it's fairly obvious in his underdeveloped characters and overdeveloped plot that this is a first novel, lacking subtleties of voice and style. This is a quick, easy read and it's unfortunate the author muddled up almost every line with the word fuck because this book could be a great Young Adult title, as adults won't find much nuance here.

5 comments:

  1. I like the opening part where you clearly mention the difficulty in analyzing Patrick. That also was one part of the book I had to reread over briefly to make sure I wasn't missing anything. Luckily the book really isn't long enough to make me dread having to go back over a section...On the other part of the characters being flat, good description; the prose may be a little bit harsh on the writing but I think it gives a good sense of how the characters will develop as you read the story.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Wow, it seems like you really dove into this book, and gave it a chance for everything it was worth. I appreciate when you say "What the author lacks in character development he supplements with cliches." I like how you view the book as a complete product, saying that the character development is sort of replaced with something else. I also like when you say, "Every chapter is too cleanly summed up like an after-school special leaving the reader thinking, no way." That's a great line, and it seems to be a good descriptor of this book. Excellent review.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Your review is spot on. The characters are truly undeveloped and have no chance in completing this goal of theirs. Everything comes to easy for the friends'. I like how you compared it to an after school special because after each chapter, there was no cliff hanger to hold you on to the next one. Except when Danny holds the gun, but that was obviously going to happen. And the '58 Les Paul had a prominent point in the middle but lost itself for numerous chapters.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I completely agree with you on the book being filled with 70's cliches. To me the book kind of came off as a bad spin off episode of That 70's Show, but with profanity

    ReplyDelete
  5. Slow start, great finish. Grammatical mishaps left and right, but only cause I'm a grammar prude. The actual meat of the review was well-developed, and covered the concept of the novel well.

    ReplyDelete